CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE NONCONVENTIONAL PROCESSES WITHIN THE NATIONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM OF SIGNALING IN THE CONTEXT OF ROMANIA'S ACCESSION TO THE SCHENGEN AREA
Abstract
The scientific work aims to present the role of the National Signaling Information System within the cooperation in the Schengen Area from the perspective of security risks. We believe that the implementation of a quality management system within the National Signaling Information System would have a positive impact on the quality of services, of the management of the organization which, in fact, influences the quality of the other processes of the organization. We have come to the conclusion that, basically, the simple fact that the manager takes responsibility for the implementation of the system is not enough, but neither is it expected that the manager will "move" to the quality department. The basic idea is that the top manager must express his reasoned point of view to make it obvious to all employees that he is using the quality management system to validate his decisions and to identify areas for improvement in the level of all services and compartments. From the research carried out by the authors up to this point, we have not identified a quality management system within the National Signaling Information System. Completing the process of Romania's accession to the Schengen Area as soon as possible appears as a necessity to ensure more security for European citizens. The biggest responsibility of the manager of the organization that coordinates and manages this IT system is to identify innovative approaches to face the moment of Romania's acceptance into the Schengen Area. The research carried out by the authors in this direction is explained and detailed in this scientific paper.
References
2. ISO 9001:2015, Sisteme de management al calității.
3. Ministerul Afacerilor Interne, Mapă Documentară, nr. 2, (2018).
4. Drăgulescu N., Managementul calității serviciilor, Editura Agir București (2003).
5. Juran J.,M., Planificarea calității, Editura Teora București (2000).
6. Oprean, C., & Țîțu, M., Politici și mecanisme instituționale în domeniul calității, Cluj-Napoca: Universității Tehnice Cluj Napoca (2018).
7. Ordinul M.A.I nr.150 pentru aprobarea Regulamentului de organizare și funcționare a Centrului Național SIS, (2013). Preluat de pe legislatie.just.: https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/152347
8. Oprean, C, & Titu, M., Managementul calității, Sibiu: ULBS, (2008).
9. Legea nr.141 privind înființarea, organizarea și funcționarea Sistemului Informatic Național de Semnalări și participarea României la Sistemul de Informații Schengen, (2010).
10. Drăgănescu, N., Lucrare de masterat, Spațiul Schengen și România, (2018).
11. Regulamentul UE 2018/1861 privind instituirea, funcționarea și utilizarea Sistemului de Informații Schengen (SIS), (2018).
12. Regulamentul UE 2018/1862 privind instituirea, funcționarea și utilizarea Sistemului de Informații Schengen (SIS), (2018).
13. Ilieş, L., Managementul calității totale, Cluj-Napoca: Editura Dacia, (2003).
14. García-Fernández M., Claver-Cortés E., José Tarí J., Relationships between quality management, innovation and performance: A literature systematic review, European Research on Management and Business Economic,Volume 28,Issue1,(2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100172.
15. Roloff, R., COVID-19 and No One’s World: What Impact for the European Union? Connections, 19 (2), 25–37, (2020). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26937607
16. Segura, D. S. M., Las lógicas de gobierno de lo fronterizo en el espacio Schengen - The logic of border governance in the Schengen Area: la frontera como estriación, Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals, 122, 15–38. (2019). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26843344
Copyright (c) 2023 Petrica Tertereanu, Mihail Aurel Titu, Constantin Oprean
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.